British Uncle and Nephew Sue Andorra for €Tens of Thousands After 14-Month Detention on Acquitted Rape Charges
Acquitted due to inconsistencies in accuser's statements and lack of evidence, the UK men claim presumption of innocence was ignored and pretrial release options overlooked.
Key Points
- British uncle and nephew acquitted of group rape charges in Andorra after 14-month detention.
- Acquittal due to inconsistencies in accuser's statements and lack of evidence.
- Men sue Andorran state for €tens of thousands, claiming ignored presumption of innocence.
- Pretrial release options overlooked despite early doubts.
Two British relatives, an uncle and nephew, have filed a civil lawsuit against the Andorran state seeking substantial compensation for the 14 months they spent detained in La Comella prison before their acquittal on group rape charges.
The men, UK residents, travelled to Andorra in January 2024 for a short leisure trip with others. They initially stayed at a Pas de la Casa hotel, where the alleged incident occurred with a temporary worker. Courts later deemed the encounter consensual, involving only the 26-year-old nephew, while the uncle denied any intimate contact. Investigators grew suspicious after the pair discreetly left that hotel overnight and moved to another in Soldeu. Police arrested them there, and prosecutors sought eight-year sentences for each on rape counts, plus additional months for the nephew's admitted cocaine use.
They remained in custody until their March 2024 trial at the Tribunal de Corts. The judges cited repeated inconsistencies in the alleged victim's statements and a lack of conclusive evidence, acquitting them on 21 March and releasing them without restrictions. Both the Tribunal de Corts ruling and the Tribunal Superior's penal chamber later upheld the acquittals due to reasonable doubt.
One year after their release, with the Tribunal Superior having confirmed the outcome, the men—now rebuilding their lives in the UK—argue that Andorran judicial processes failed catastrophically. They claim the presumption of innocence was ignored despite early doubts, and pretrial measures such as supervised release were not properly considered. The lawsuit, for damages in the tens of thousands of euros, will be heard by the full Tribunal Superior plenum, where further details of their grievances will emerge.
Related Articles
Other articles from Catalan-language sources about the same story:
- Diari d'Andorra•
L’advocat del massatgista carrega contra la sentència i reclama la llibertat
- Diari d'Andorra•
L’advocat del massatgista condemnat per agressions sexuals denuncia contradiccions de les víctimes
- Altaveu•
El cas del massatgista condemnat per agressions sexuals arriba al Tribunal Superior
- El Periòdic•
Versions contradictòries marquen un judici per una presumpta agressió sense indicis concloents sobre l’autor
- Altaveu•
Un acusat de violar una fillastra denuncia que no li permeten contactar amb la seva filla
- Diari d'Andorra•
L'acusat d'amenaçar de mort a l'exparella: “No deixaràs de fotre fins que et moris”
- Altaveu•
Demanda contra l'Estat de l'oncle i el nebot absolts de violació després d'estar 14 mesos a la presó
- Diari d'Andorra•
Una baralla acaba en judici per vuit punts de sutura al cap
- Diari d'Andorra•
“No deixaràs de fotre fins que et moris”
- El Periòdic•
Judici per una agressió del 2019 amb dubtes sobre l’autoria de la lesió incisa que va requerir punts de sutura
- Altaveu•
Una empenta que acaba amb cops de puny i el cap obert