Prosecutors Demand 8-Year Ban in Stalking Trial Day 2

On the second day of the trial against a 31-year-old man from Escaldes accused of stalking and abusing his ex-partner between 2021 and 2023, prosecutors intensified their demands, seeking four years of strict no-contact measures alongside an eight-year overall ban to ensure her protection.

After hearing testimony from the victim's mother, her current partner, coworkers, and police officers, public prosecutors reclassified the incidents as continuous harassment. They maintained their request for 30 months of suspended prison time but specified that half of the eight-year contact prohibition—four years—must be qualified for stricter enforcement. Key evidence included the mother's account of accompanying her daughter to avoid encounters, describing the accused as "violent" in a "toxic" relationship marked by unannounced visits to shops and persistent knocking at her door. The victim's current partner, a former friend of the accused, recounted a "trap" encounter at a plaza where the man demanded explanations after touching her shoulder during a prior casual meeting, calling his demeanor "challenging."

Coworkers revealed the accused had been hired at the victim's workplace based on prior references, unaware of their history; the company later implemented separation measures, after which he resigned voluntarily, citing family reasons informally. Police described the victim as "very affected," trembling during interventions, while the accused remained calm and cooperative. They also noted his possession of a knife, which he claimed was a daily tool.

A psychologist who treated the victim since the relationship began labeled it "dysfunctional," stating she had overcome about 90% of her anxiety, panic, and depression, though a 10% residual impact lingered, particularly fear of encountering him. A forensic doctor assessed the psychological harm as a 5% permanent partial incapacity, stemming from a "domination" dynamic and post-traumatic stress.

The defence sought full acquittal, arguing no physical violence or threats occurred and that his actions reflected mishandling the breakup emotionally.

With positions opposed, the court will issue a sentence on 27 March.