Back to home
Other·

Andorran Court Hears Clashing Testimonies in 2018 Nightclub Bouncer Assault Trial

Prosecutors seek conditional arrest and fines for two defendants charged with injuring patrons after ejection from venue on St John's Night, while defence highlights inconsistencies in victim accounts and minor medical evidence.

Synthesized from:
AltaveuDiari d'AndorraBon Dia+3

Key Points

  • Andorran court hears conflicting testimonies in 2018 nightclub bouncer assault trial.
  • Prosecutors seek conditional arrests (5 & 3 months) and fines (€3,000 & €1,500) for two defendants on minor injury charges.
  • Victims claim unprovoked punches/kicks after ejection; defendants deny violence, cite victim hostility.
  • Defence highlights inconsistencies in accounts and minor medical evidence like ibuprofen.

**Andorran Court Hears Conflicting Testimonies in 2018 Nightclub Assault Case**

The Tribunal de Corts has concluded oral arguments in the trial of two nightclub bouncers charged with three counts of minor intentional injuries from an incident outside a venue on 24 June 2018. Prosecutors argue the assaults are established and seek five months of conditional nighttime arrest plus a €3,000 fine for the primary defendant, and three months plus a €1,500 fine for the other. They also demand compensation for the victims, who sought medical care including X-rays and anti-inflammatories.

The altercation began inside the club during the early hours of St John's Night, when staff ejected a heavily intoxicated patron. Outside, accounts diverge sharply. Victims described the bouncers launching unprovoked punches and kicks. One brother recounted a porter insulting his sister-in-law, then striking her jaw—possibly with a glove—before he himself took blows to the stomach and ribs while intervening. His sibling suffered an ankle twist after falling, requiring time off work. The woman denied spitting at staff and insisted the violence occurred post-ejection following a drink dispute.

The defendants rejected the claims. The 30-year-old Andorran access controller said they merely escorted the disruptive, vomiting customer out, after which the group grew hostile and spat at them. The 28-year-old floor staffer said he only aimed to calm tensions, summoned police, and delivered no strikes.

Defence counsel pressed for acquittal or reclassification as misdemeanours, highlighting witness discrepancies—like the woman's inability to specify which cheek was struck—meagre medical needs beyond ibuprofen or Enantyum, and potential prescription after eight years. They argued X-rays were precautionary, not curative.

Prosecutors countered that victim statements align on core elements, X-rays confirm medical intervention elevating charges to felonies, and the bouncers' police call undermines their no-incident narrative. The court left the case for sentencing, tasked with resolving whether assaults occurred and if responsibility lies with the staff.

Share the article via

Original Sources

This article was aggregated from the following Catalan-language sources: